Frank H. Smith v. United Parcel Service
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DUBINA, Circuit Judge:
Frank and Harriett Smith (the “Smiths”) appeal the district court’s, dismissal of their claims for fraud, negligence, wantonness, or willfulness, and outrage against the United Parcel Service (“UPS”) and Pamela Burnett Marlow (“Marlow”),, a UPS delivery person. The district court dismissed the Smiths’ claims as preempted by the Carmack Amendment, 49 U.S.C. § 14706 (1994). We agree with the district court and hold that the Carmack Amendment preempts all of the Smiths’ claims because the claims arise from conduct involving UPS’s transportation and delivery services.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Fed. Carr. Cas. P 84,067 Tex Morris Cindy Sagrera Morris v. Covan World Wide Moving, Incorporated Coleman American Moving Services, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- Georgia, Florida & Alabama Railway Co. v. Blish Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad v. NothnagleSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Edward and Nancy Hughes v. United Van Lines, Inc., and 291 Sisser Brothers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Essex Insurance Company v. Barrett Moving & Storage, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
- Certain Underwriters at Interest at Lloyds of London v. United Parcel Service of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- White v. Mayflower Transit, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- UPS Supply Chain Solutions, Inc. v. Megatrux Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
- Hewlett-Packard Co. v. Brother's Trucking Enterprises, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2005
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.