Legal Opinion

Goldstein v. Wickett

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 18, 1957PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVaughan, J.

The appellate courts of this State have often had occasion to condemn the tardiness of some attorneys in furnishing bills of particulars in response to demand. Such tardiness demonstrably hurts the administration of justice in this State. The failure to serve a bill of particulars, which might have been prepared in minutes, may seriously delay the trial of an action on the merits. The workday of overburdened trial judges must then be consumed by motions to preclude and motions to vacate preclusion orders, and if, as often occurs, the latter are ignored or lightly regarded, then the solemn…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kamp v. Syracuse Transit Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
  2. Richards v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
  3. Gigliotti v. MorascoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. DeJohn v. D. W. Winkelman Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  2. Frangione v. CordascoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  3. In re the Estate of JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API