Legal Opinion

Kamp v. Syracuse Transit Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 17, 1954PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed, without costs of this appeal to any party. Memorandum: Under the circumstances here presented, we think the Special Term was well within the boundaries of its discretion in modifying the preclusion orders previously made. We are aware of the lax practice of many attorneys in failing to comply with the provisions of rule 115 of the Rules of Civil Practice. We do not condone this practice. The rule is a beneficial one to promote expedition in the disposition of litigated matters, and bills of particulars should be served within the time limited by that rule. On the other hand,…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Goldstein v. WickettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
  2. Sammons v. MahernNew York Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Boin v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesNew York District Court · 1960
  4. W. R. Simmons & Associates Research, Inc. v. Ziff-Davis Publishing Co.New York Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API