Legal Opinion

Simmons v. National Live Stock Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 23, 1915No. Docket No. 18PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Gratiot; Searle, J. Assumpsit by Orla J. Simmons against the National Live Stock Insurance Company upon a policy of insurance. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

On January 27, 1913, the plaintiff was the owner of three valuable stallions. Desiring to secure insurance upon them, he made application to the defendant company. A separate application was made as to each, horse, and the several applications contained represen*553tations as to the purchase price paid for each horse as follows:

“Gascon.
“Q. Was purchase price cash, trade, or both? If part trade, state what it consisted of. Ans. Purchase part trade and part cash, $2,250. Q. Cash paid for animal? Ans. $750. Q. Is purchase money all paid? Ans. Yes. Q. If not, for what sum, to whom, and when due? (Not…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. McNally v. Phœnix InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. Griffey v. New York Central InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  3. Quin v. . LloydNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
  4. Anderson v. GoffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Carpenter v. German American InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1892

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. George v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Blake v. Farmers' Mutual Lightning Protected Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Ruggirello v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Schmidt ex rel. Schmidt v. StoneNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Barbour v. WaterstonMichigan Supreme Court · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API