Legal Opinion

Busing v. Pierson

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 23, 1940No. Civ. No. 11336PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

This is an appeal from an order denying a motion to substitute W. P. Nichols as plaintiff in the above-entitled action in the place and stead of H. B. Busing, as administrator of the estate of Louie S. Dexter, deceased.

There have been two prior appeals in this case (Dexter v. Pierson, 214 Cal. 247 [4 Pac. (2d) 932]; Busing v. Pierson, 1 Cal. (2d) 495 [36 Pac. (2d) 116].) The motion to substitute involved on this appeal was not made until August, 1936, being almost two years after the judgment had become final. During the pendency of this appeal, Catherine A. McKenna, one of the defendants in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Foster v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Grant v. Los Angeles & Pacific RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Dexter v. PiersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Shepard v. YaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  5. Eddie v. Schumacher Wall Board Co.California Court of Appeal · 1926

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Clanton v. ClantonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API