Legal Opinion

Antrobus v. Sherman

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 5, 1884PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Mills Circuit Cou/rt. Upon motion certain costs, made by the sheriff by the service of notices in garnishment proceedings, were taxed against plaintiff, and judgment therefor rendered accordingly. Plaintiff' appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.

I. The record discloses the following facts: Plaintiff sent the note upon which judgment in this case was rendered to Gregg, an attorney at law, for collection, who prepared a petition and other papers required in the commencement of a suit, and sent them to Hale, Stone & Proudfit, attorneys residing in the same county with defendant, with directions to file the papers and take other necessary steps in order to institute the suit. At the request of Gregg, these attorneys gave attention to the case, and finally procured judgment. After judgment, Gregg directed them to press the collection.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Smalley v. GreeneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1879
  2. Hoover v. . GreenbaumNew York Court of Appeals · 1874

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Crawford v. NolanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886
  2. Orwig v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1933
  3. Lord v. WoodSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
  4. Carson, Pirie, Scott & Co. v. LongSupreme Court of Iowa · 1934
  5. Gillilland v. BrantnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API