State v. Ward
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MOORE, Justice.
The record discloses that in the selection of the jury “the solicitor was allowed to challenge for cause 18 prospective jurors after said 18 jurors stated on voir dire that he or she would not under any circumstances, regardless of the evidence, consider joining in a verdict the result of which the death penalty would be imposed, but would automatically vote against such a verdict regardless of the evidence and would not even consider such a verdict in his or her deliberation of the case.” Defendant’s first assignment of error is that the exercise of these 18 challenges by the…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- State v. Marshall Norman HicksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- State v. WaddellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- State v. FoustSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- State v. JarretteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- State v. HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- State v. WilkersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. CherrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- State v. MonkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.