Legal Opinion

Seneca Falls Greenhouse & Nursery v. Layton

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided February 27, 1990No. Record No. 1696-88-4PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOON, J.

Seneca Falls Greenhouse & Nursery and Florists Mutual Insurance Company seek reversal of an award of compensation and disability payments to Charles G. Layton. We affirm the award because we find credible evidence to support the commission’s decision.

The first issue deals with Rule 2(A) of the Industrial Commission which provides that the request for review “should specify each determination of fact or law to which exception is taken,” and must be made within twenty days of the deputy’s decision. Appellants argue that the deputy commissioner found that Charles G. Layton was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Burlington Mills Corp. v. HagoodSupreme Court of Virginia · 1941
  3. Classic Floors, Inc. v. GuyCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1989
  4. Haigh v. Matsushita Elec. Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1987
  5. Brushy Ridge Coal Co., Inc. v. BlevinsCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Landers v. Chrysler Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Greif Companies (GENESCO) v. SipeCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1993
  3. Bennett v. RichmondIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Ratliff v. Rocco Farm FoodsCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1993
  5. Bassett Burkeville, etc. v. Richard R. Slaughter JrCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API