Ratliff v. Rocco Farm Foods
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BENTON, J.
Patricia Darlene Ratliff contends that the commission erred when it considered on review an issue that was not raised by either party, viz., whether the evidence was sufficient to establish an injury by industrial accident. Ratliff further contends that even if the issue was properly considered, the commission erred in determining that the evidence was insufficient to establish an injury by accident. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the commission’s decisions.
I
The evidence proved that Ratliff was inspecting poultry on a conveyor belt at the Rocco Farm Foods plant on…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Morris v. MorrisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1989
- MANASSAS ICE AND FUEL CO. v. FarrarCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1991
- Lane Co., Inc. v. SaundersSupreme Court of Virginia · 1985
- Brushy Ridge Coal Co., Inc. v. BlevinsCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1988
- Amp, Inc. v. RuebushCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Arellano v. Pam E. K's Donuts ShopCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1998
- Boyd v. People, Inc.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 2004
- Boyd v. People, Inc.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 2004
- Donna Mitchell v. The Miller Group and Pennsylvania Manufacturing Association Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 2005
- Food Lion, LLC and Delhaize America, Inc. v. Laura OteyCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2011
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.