Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Dana Troy Andress

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 24, 1995No. 94-5495PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a drag ease in which the defendant appeals his sentence. The question presented is a narrow one: whether a change in the way the weight of Lysergic Acid Diethyla-mide (LSD) is determined under the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines effected a corresponding change in the way the weight of LSD is determined under a statute mandating a minimum sentence. The district court answered this question in the negative. We agree, and we shall affirm the sentence.

I

A jury found the defendant, Dana Troy Andress, guilty of attempting to possess 3200 dosage units of LSD with intent to distribute it, in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Chapman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. United States v. Jose Domingo Munoz-RealpeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
  3. United States v. Donald PardueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  4. United States v. Joaquin Palacio, Also Known as Ruben ZapataCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
  5. United States v. Meirl Gilbert NealCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Neal v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. United States v. Robert James StonekingCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
  3. United States v. PopeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
  4. United States v. Gregory Alan KinderCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  5. United States v. Robert IngramCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API