Legal Opinion
United States v. Pope
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided July 26, 1995No. 94-2029PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Per curiam
The United States appeals from the judgment of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida granting Michael Stanley Pope, Jr.’s motion to modify his term of imprisonment. For the reasons stated below, we reverse and remand.
I. BACKGROUND
On January 23, 1992, Pope pleaded guilty pursuant to a written plea agreement to charges of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute (Count One), and possession with intent to distribute (Count Two), more than ten grams of lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD), in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846. According to the stipulated…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Stinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Chapman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. Jose Domingo Munoz-RealpeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Bernal Chavarria-HerraraCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Neal v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. EggersdorfCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
- United States v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
- United States v. CarterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.