Legal Opinion
United States v. Donald Pardue
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided October 17, 1994No. 94-30208PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Per curiam
In this sentencing guidelines appeal, Defendant-Appellant Donald Pardue complains of the district court’s denial of his motion for modification of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(e)(2). He asserts that the district court abused its discretion in denying his modification motion that was based on a post-sentencing amendment to the guidelines affecting the determination of the quantity of Lysergic Acid Diethylamide (LSD) to be used in calculating sentences. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.
I
FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
Pardue pleaded guilty to conspiracy to possess with intent to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Chapman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. Patricia Ann ShawCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. John Timothy MillerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Christopher Lee BootCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Quentin J. MuellerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Neal v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. Malcolm Jones WhitebirdCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. George Labonte, United States of America v. David E. Piper, United States of America v. Alfred Lawrence Hunnewell, Stephen Dyer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- United States v. CookCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
- United States v. BordenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.