Rice v. Wadkins
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Appellant contends the district court erred by failing to apply our comparative negligence statute retrospectively. We disagree.
Appellant sought damages for personal injuries sustained in an automobile-pedestrian accident on April 7, 1971, in Las Vegas, Nevada. Subsequent to the accident, but before trial, the Nevada legislature enacted our comparative negligence statute. 1 At trial, the appellant argued that the jury should be instructed on comparative negligence instead of contributory negligence because the newly-enacted statute was retroactive. However, the statute was silent as to…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Joseph v. LoweryOregon Supreme Court · 1972
- State ex rel. Sparks v. State Bank & Trust Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1920
- Fitch v. Elko CountyNevada Supreme Court · 1873
- Miller v. AshurstNevada Supreme Court · 1970
4Cited by13 opinions
- Evangelatos v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Viers v. DunlapOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- Warmbrodt v. BlanchardNevada Supreme Court · 1984
- BUCK BY BUCK v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1989
- Young's MacHine Co. v. LongNevada Supreme Court · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.