Legal Opinion

Rice v. Wadkins

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1976No. 8654PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Appellant contends the district court erred by failing to apply our comparative negligence statute retrospectively. We disagree.

Appellant sought damages for personal injuries sustained in an automobile-pedestrian accident on April 7, 1971, in Las Vegas, Nevada. Subsequent to the accident, but before trial, the Nevada legislature enacted our comparative negligence statute. 1 At trial, the appellant argued that the jury should be instructed on comparative negligence instead of contributory negligence because the newly-enacted statute was retroactive. However, the statute was silent as to…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Joseph v. LoweryOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  2. State ex rel. Sparks v. State Bank & Trust Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Fitch v. Elko CountyNevada Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Miller v. AshurstNevada Supreme Court · 1970

4Cited by13 opinions

  1. Evangelatos v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Viers v. DunlapOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Warmbrodt v. BlanchardNevada Supreme Court · 1984
  4. BUCK BY BUCK v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Young's MacHine Co. v. LongNevada Supreme Court · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API