BUCK BY BUCK v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*758OPINION
By the Court,
Steffen, J.:
The central issues of this appeal concern the meaning and scope of Nevada’s “Good Samaritan” statute, the applicability of an amendment to the comparative negligence statute to the instant case, and the availability of damages for emotional distress. We *759conclude, with one exception, that appellants’ position on each of these issues is correct and grant relief accordingly.
Facts
Late one summer night in 1978, Debra Buck and her twin three-year-old daughters, Tina and Heather, were passengers in a car driven by Marsha Buck. The Bucks were returning from a camping…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Dillon v. LeggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Old Aztec Mine, Inc. v. BrownNevada Supreme Court · 1981
- Egede-Nissen v. Crystal Mountain, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1980
- Dahl v. TurnerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969
- State v. EatonNevada Supreme Court · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Consolidated Rail Corporation v. GottshallSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Fogg v. MacAlusoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- Ges, Inc. v. CorbittNevada Supreme Court · 2001
- Kraszewski v. Baptist Medical Center of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Banks Ex Rel. Banks v. Sunrise Hosp.Nevada Supreme Court · 2004
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.