Legal Opinion
Ulick v. Vibration Specialty Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided November 26, 1943No. Appeal, 203PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Patterson,
The question for determination is: May a warrant of attorney to confess judgment contained in a contract signed by the Federal Home Improvement Co., a fictitious name .for an individual who owns said company, be exercised by the individual against the other contracting party?
On November 2,1942, Vibration Specialty Company, appellant, and the Federal Home Improvement Co., a business owned and operated by Edna Ulick, and duly registered of record under and pursuant to the Pennsylvania Assumed or Fictitious Names Act, entered into an agreement for a construction…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Estate of Edwin R. MackSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Boggs v. LevinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- Williams v. NotopolosSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
- Rome S. Amp S. Station v. FinchSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Miller v. Royal Flint Glass WorksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Fourtees Co. v. Sterling Equipment Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Metro Bulletins Corp. v. SoboleskiConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Testa v. Lally Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Produce Factors Corp. v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Penton Publishing, Inc v. MarkeyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.