Legal Opinion

Gordon v. Pollock

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 14, 1926No. 15704PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

PINKHAM, C.

This was a suit brought by the defendant in error, J. N. Pollock, plaintiff in the trial court, against Samuel Gordon and the First National Bank of Oklahoma City, for the sum of $350 and interest. The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the lower court.

The plaintiff, Pollock, alleged, in substance, in his petition, that he, “pursuant to a telephone conversation, sold defendant Gordon an assignment of a 40-acre oil and gas lease for a consideration of $350 cash,” describing the same; that it was agreed between plaintiff and defendants that the assignment of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Aylesbury Mercantile Co. v. FitchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. Chickasaw Compress Co. v. BowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Payne v. McCormick Harvesting Machine Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1901
  4. Beams v. YoungSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. Farris v. StoutzSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. O'Brien v. FrickeNebraska Supreme Court · 1947
  2. McDaniel v. McCauleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
  3. Evans v. Platte Valley Public Power & Irrigation DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Garner v. GroganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API