Legal Opinion

State v. Nguyen

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided January 25, 1996No. 1 CA-CR 95-0202-PRPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LANKFORD, Judge.

The State of Arizona petitions this Court pursuant to Rule 32.9(c), Arizona Rules of Criminal Procedure, for review of the trial court’s order granting in part the petition for post-conviction relief filed by defendant Thai Minh Nguyen. The trial court found that defendant was entitled to a disproportionality review of his sentence and ordered the Arizona Department of Corrections to commence the review process. We grant review and grant relief because this defendant is not entitled to the review.

Defendant was convicted of the sale of a narcotic drug, a class two…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. James Robert McQueary v. James Blodgett, Superintendent, Wsp Corrections, Dept of Indeterminate Sentencing Review BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  4. Valley Nat. Bank of Phoenix v. GloverArizona Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Big D Construction Corp. v. Court of AppealsArizona Supreme Court · 1990

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. v. Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  2. Aegis of Arizona, L.L.C. v. Town of MaranaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
  3. State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
  4. State v. NavarroCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
  5. Drew v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2009

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API