Legal Opinion

Friedman v. Baron

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 15, 1928PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment reversed upon the law and the facts, with costs, and judgment directed in favor of plaintiffs for the sum of $5,000, with costs. We are of opinion that the variance of four feet on the parcel is a material variance, and that the learned trial court had no power to compel plaintiffs to accept less than they had contracted to purchase. Findings of fact and conclusions of law contrary to this decision are reversed, and new findings will be made in accordance herewith. Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Young, Seeger and Carswell, JJ., concur. Settle order on notice.

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sandberg v. Margold Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. Goldstein v. SternNew York Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Goodman v. FisherNew York Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Neill v. WrightNew York Supreme Court · 1964
  5. V.A. Tellis v. Briamar AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990