Legal Opinion

Warner v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)

Decided May 8, 1997No. 03-95-00371-CRPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARROLL, Chief Justice.

This appeal is taken from convictions for aggravated kidnapping, aggravated assault, and arson. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. §§ 20.04, 22.02, & 28.02 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). 1 Appellant Michael Warner challenges his convictions in five points of error, alleging: (1) the evidence was factually insufficient to support the aggravated assault conviction, (2) the trial court erred in refusing to instruct the jury on a lesser included offense and causation, and (3) the trial court erred in excluding evidence that Warner suffered from post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). We…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  2. Clewis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  3. Royster v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  4. Penry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
  5. Stone v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Warner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
  2. Darnes v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2003
  3. Jackson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2003
  4. Saldana v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2001
  5. State v. BizoviMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API