Legal Opinion

Former Employees of Carhartt, Inc. v. Chao

United States Court of International Trade

Decided June 13, 2001No. Court 99-12-00734Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

Eaton, Judge:

Before the Court is the Former Employees of Carhartt, Inc.’s (“Plaintiffs”) Motion for Summary Judgment 1 contesting the United States Department of Labor’s (“Labor”) decision denying Plaintiffs’ petition for North American Free Trade Agreement Transitional Adjustment Assistance benefits (“NAFTA-TAA”). The Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2395(a) (1994) and 19 U.S.C. § 1581(d)(1) (1994). For the reasons set forth below, the Court finds that Labor’s decision is supported by substantial evidence and is in accordance with law, and therefore denies Plaintiffs’…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, Uaw v. F. Ray MarshallCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
  2. Abbott v. DonovanUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983
  3. Hazel Paden v. U. S. Department of Labor and the Secretary of the Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
  4. Robert W. Pemberton v. F. Ray Marshall, Secretary, Department of Labor, United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
  5. Oralee D. Lloyd v. U. S. Department of Labor, Elaine Abts Shirley Mitchell Corine Howarter Alice v. Smith and Shirley A. Smith v. U. S. Department of Labor, Keith R. Klemme v. U. S. Department of Labor, Valorie Anne Repka v. U. S. Department of Labor, King Fox, Clarence Domingo, Warren S. Short and Robert Stevenson, on Behalf of a Group of Kaiser Steel Corporation Workers, Napa, California v. United States Department of Labor, Harold A. Bratt, Harry J. Gilman and Marvin FooksCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API