Legal Opinion

Espinoza v. Safeco Title Insurance Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 9, 1979No. 15999PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILKINS, Justice:

Plaintiffs appeal from summary judgment dismissing their complaint by the District Court, Davis County. Affirmed. Costs to defendants.

Plaintiffs purchased real property from Defendants Gilman, who provided title insurance issued by Defendant Safeco Title Insurance Co., (hereafter, “Safeco”). Thereafter, a defect in the title, in the form of a tax lien filed against the property by the Internal Revenue Service, was discovered by plaintiffs, who informed Safeco of the defect. Plaintiffs assert that Safeco proposed to do nothing to clear the title except to wait for the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. PetersonNevada Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Lyon v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1971
  3. American States Ins. Co., Western Pac. Div. v. WalkerUtah Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Ammerman Ex Rel. Ammerman v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeUtah Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Stubbs v. HemmertUtah Supreme Court · 1977

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Zions First National Bank, N.A. v. National American Title Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Mellor v. ChamberlinWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Secor v. KnightUtah Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Western Casualty & Surety Co. v. MarchantUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Crist v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1982

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API