Legal Opinion
Yates v. Hertz Corp.
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Decided September 10, 2003No. 3:02-0286PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
TRAUGER, District Judge.
Pending before the court is defendant The Hertz Corporation’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 20), to which plaintiff has responded (Docket No. 40), defendant has replied, (Docket No. 45), and plaintiff has filed a sur-reply (Docket No. 49).
Factual Background and Procedural History
Defendant The Hertz Corporation (“Hertz”) is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in New Jersey. (Docket No. 11, Amended Complaint at ¶ 2; Docket No. 15, Answer to Plaintiffs Amended Complaint at ¶ 2.) As part of its international operations, Hertz…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Clark County School District v. BreedenSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ellis v. Buzzi Unicem USACourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Carty v. Suter Co., Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2007
- Conley v. Yellow Freight System, Inc.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2007
- Turner v. Liberty National Life InsuranceDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2007
- Carty v. Suter Company, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.