Legal Opinion
Roberts v. Abbott
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 30, 1920No. Civ. No. 3222PublishedCited by 11 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
This is an action to quiet title (1) to a three-fourths interest in a certain mining claim -alleged to he owned by the plaintiff E. S. Roberts, and (2) to all the “surface rights” of such mining claim, alleged to be owned by the plaintiff Jeal. The lower court found for the plaintiffs, and judgment was accordingly entered against all the defendants. From the judgment defendant F. J. Abbott alone appeals.
It is conceded at the outset, by all parties to this suit, that the title is derived either directly or through mesne conveyances from the plaintiff E. S. Roberts.
We think all the points…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cordano v. WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Estate of GoetzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
- Ellis v. JeansCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
- Powell v. HunterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
3Cited by11 opinions
- Strong v. StrongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Chaffee v. SorensenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Childs v. NewfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Lewis H v. May and Nancy C. May v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Lavi v. Pelican Investment Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.