Legal Opinion
Hermann v. Rutgers Cas. Ins. Co.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided November 19, 1987PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
221 N.J. Super. 162 (1987)
534 A.2d 51
SAROLTA HERMANN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT AND CROSS-APPELLANT,
v.
RUTGERS CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND CROSS-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued October 15, 1987.
Decided November 19, 1987.
Before Judges FURMAN, LONG and SCALERA.
Stacey R. Sack, argued the cause for appellant (Charles E. Reynolds, attorney, Stacey R. Sack on the brief).
Anthony M. Campisano, argued the cause for respondent (Borrus, Goldin, Foley, Vignuolo, Hyman and Stahl, attorneys, Anthony M. Campisano on the brief).
The opinion of the court…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Nieder v. Royal Indemnity InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
- Motor Club of America Insurance v. PhillipsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
- Amiano v. Ohio Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
- Enright v. LubowNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
- Brokenbaugh v. NJ Manufacturers Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Walcott v. Allstate NJ Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
- Rutgers Casualty Insurance v. Ohio Casualty InsuranceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
- CSC Ins. Services v. GravesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996
- Estate of Leeman v. Eagle InsuranceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
- Gonzalez v. PLIGA.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.