Legal Opinion
Rutgers Casualty Insurance v. Ohio Casualty Insurance
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided April 1, 1997PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
KING, P.J.A.D.
I
These ten consolidated cases atúse from similar factual situations. The legal issue is the right of contribution between automobile insurance carriers paying Personal Injury Protection (PIP) benefits. In each case the person injured in an automobile accident was either the named insured or a resident relative of a named insured under a Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company (Rutgers) policy. Each Rutgers insured was injured while a pedestrian or while a passenger in a vehicle not owned by the Rutgers’ insured. The defendant automobile…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Amiano v. Ohio Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
- Selected Risks Ins. Co. v. Allstate Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
- Fellippello v. Allstate Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979
- Cokenakes v. Ohio Casualty Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
- Federal Ins. Co. v. Liberty Mutual Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Schaefer v. Allstate NJ Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
- State Farm Indemnity Co. v. National Liability & Fire InsuranceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2015
- Country-Wide Insurance v. Allstate InsuranceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
- IFA Insurance v. Atlantic Mutual InsuranceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000
- Rutgers Cas. Ins. Co. v. Ohio Cas. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.