Legal Opinion

Diamond v. Diamond

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 18, 1951PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDiFalco, J.

This is a derivative stockholder’s action, brought on behalf of Jarold Shops, Inc., by the plaintiff, Mae Diamond, who was and is a director and an owner of 50% of the capital stock of the corporation. The action is part of a consolidated action, the other branches of which have been discontinued. The defendant, Evelyn Diamond, was and is a director and the owner of the other 50% of the corporation’s stock. Plaintiff asserts that defendant, together with plaintiff’s husband, now deceased — who, on plaintiff’s designation, was made and functioned as the president of the corporation — conspired…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Ultramares Corp. v. ToucheNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. Home Fire Insurance v. BarberNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Krumm v. . BeachNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  4. National Life Ins. Co. v. . MinchNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  5. Capitol Wine & Spirit Corp. v. PokrassNew York Court of Appeals · 1951

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Burg v. HornDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1965
  2. Epperly v. E. & P. Brake Bonding, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Diamond v. DiamondNew York Supreme Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API