Epperly v. E. & P. Brake Bonding, Inc.
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Case Summary
Buchanan, P.J.
Appellant-Counter-Defendant Harrison R. Epperly (Epperly) appeals from a judgment in favor of Counter-Plaintiff, E. & P. Brake Bonding, Inc. (E. & P.), claiming that a prior settlement agreement barred recovery.
Reversed.
Facts
The evidence and facts most favorable to the trial court’s judgment are:
Epperly and Robert W. Pucillo (Pucillo) operated a brake bonding business, first as a partnership, and then as E. & P. Brake Bonding, Inc.
Each owned one half of the stock of the corporation and was a director. Epperly was President and General Manager, and Pucillo spent most…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Duane Jones Co. v. BurkeNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Home Fire Insurance v. BarberNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
- Bancroft-Whitney Co. v. GlenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Hartung v. Architects Hartung/Odle/Burke, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1973
- Diamond v. DiamondNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- McLinden v. CocoIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
- Miller v. Krause (In Re Krause)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 1988
- Venture Express, Inc. v. ZillyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
- Yerke v. BatmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978
- Griffin v. Carmel Bank & Trust Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.