Legal Opinion

Epperly v. E. & P. Brake Bonding, Inc.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 24, 1976No. 2-174A39PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Case Summary

Buchanan, P.J.

Appellant-Counter-Defendant Harrison R. Epperly (Epperly) appeals from a judgment in favor of Counter-Plaintiff, E. & P. Brake Bonding, Inc. (E. & P.), claiming that a prior settlement agreement barred recovery.

Reversed.

Facts

The evidence and facts most favorable to the trial court’s judgment are:

Epperly and Robert W. Pucillo (Pucillo) operated a brake bonding business, first as a partnership, and then as E. & P. Brake Bonding, Inc.

Each owned one half of the stock of the corporation and was a director. Epperly was President and General Manager, and Pucillo spent most…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Duane Jones Co. v. BurkeNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
  2. Home Fire Insurance v. BarberNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Bancroft-Whitney Co. v. GlenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Hartung v. Architects Hartung/Odle/Burke, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. Diamond v. DiamondNew York Court of Appeals · 1954

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. McLinden v. CocoIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Miller v. Krause (In Re Krause)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 1988
  3. Venture Express, Inc. v. ZillyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
  4. Yerke v. BatmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. Griffin v. Carmel Bank & Trust Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API