Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Feigl v. Raacke
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided January 24, 1975No. File 155485PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSaden, J.
In this action, raising an issue not heretofore determined by Connecticut courts, the plaintiff, Frederick M. Feigl, an elector and resident of the town of New Fairfield, seeks a writ of mandamus to compel (1) the board of selectmen to warn a special town meeting pursuant to a petition presented to it on September 17,1974, under General Statutes § 7-1, which would direct the selectmen, board of finance, and town treasurer to rebate $342,460 to all taxpayers of the town, which sum was allegedly levied in excess of the fiscal year budget approved by the town meeting; (2) the board of finance to…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Consolidated Diesel Electric Corp. v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- State Ex Rel. Brush v. Sixth Taxing DistrictSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- State v. FylerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1880
- State Ex Rel. Lacerenza v. OsbornSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
- Conners v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Moshier v. GoodnowSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Quoka v. Drapko, No. Cv91 0036714s (Nov. 25, 1992)Connecticut Superior Court · 1992