Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Lacerenza v. Osborn
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided April 9, 1947PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
In this action for a mandamus to compel the defendant to issue, pursuant to § 2767 of the General Statutes, a certificate of registration to the plaintiff as a person entitled to practice natureopathy, these essential allegations of the alternative writ are undisputed upon the first defense of the defendant’s return: The state hoard of natureopathic examiners issued to the plaintiff on August 28,1946, a certificate of approval to practice natureopathy pursuant to his application, made as required by the provisions of § 545g of the 1943 Supplement, for a certificate without examination. On…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Union Pacific Railroad v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- State Ex Rel. Foote v. BartholomewSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- Rosenthal v. State Bar Examining CommitteeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
- People Ex Rel. Wood v. Board of Assessors & Collector of TaxesNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- American Casualty Insurance & Security Co. v. FylerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1891
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- State v. SpringerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
- Gibson v. Connecticut Medical Examining BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Hannifan v. SachsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
- State Ex Rel. Scala v. Airport CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- Custer v. BonadiesConnecticut Superior Court · 1974
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.