Eucaline Medicine Co. v. Standard Inv. Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
This appeal is from an adverse judgment against appellants in favor of Standard Investment Company, in an action on a promissory note. The case has not been briefed by appellants, their contention, made in open court, being that the record discloses fundamental, and therefore reversible error. However, affirmance may be had under the view presented in the brief filed for appellee, if the contention of appellants is not tenable.
The sole contention of appellants urged in their motion for a new trial in the court below was that the judgment was void, in that, the judge before whom the case was…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ex Parte GarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Lytle v. HalffCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1889
- Wolf v. BrassTexas Supreme Court · 1888
- In re the Appointment of a Revisor of the StatutesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
- State ex rel. Douglas v. WestfallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Schweizer v. AdcockTexas Supreme Court · 1946
- Texas Turnpike Authority v. ShepperdTexas Supreme Court · 1955
- Pierson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1944
- Tivoli Corp. v. Jewelers Mutual Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1996
- Randel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1949
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.