Legal Opinion

Di Giendemonica v. Pennsylvania-Reading Seashore Lines

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided September 22, 1939PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Wells, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered for the defendant upon the striking of the amended complaint on the ground that it did not set forth a cause of action. The suit arose out of a collision which occurred November 24-th, 1937, between a locomotive owned and operated by the defendant company and an automobile truck, wherein plaintiffs intestate was riding, at a grade crossing in the borough of Pennsgrove, Salem county, New Jersey, at a point where Pitman street intersects the railroad tracks and right of way of the defendant company.

Plaint…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Haller v. Pennsylvania R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. Klein v. United Railways & Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1927
  3. Horandt v. Central RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1909
  4. Green v. Erie RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1900

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Monforton v. Northern Pacific Railway CompanyMontana Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Bush v. BushNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
  3. Pangborn v. Central Railroad Co. of NJNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
  4. Girardin v. NY & LONG BRANCH R. CO.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
  5. Monforton v. Northern Pacific Railway CompanyMontana Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API