Legal Opinion

United States v. Lillard

District Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided July 24, 1956No. 1350PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RIDGE, District Judge.

This suit was, commenced under the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938, as amended and supplemented, 7 U.S.C.A. §§ 1281 to 1393; .Act of Jan. 30, 1954, 68 Stat. 4; and Act of Aug. 28, 1954, 68 Stat. 897, to recover from defendant, $401.41, as penalty for farm marketing excess of wheat in the year 1954. Section 376 of the Act, 7 U.S.C.A. § 1376 and 28 U.S.C.A. § 1345 place jurisdiction of the subject-matter of this action in this Court.

Defendant has moved for summary judgment under Rule 56, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. Immediately thereafter plaintiff…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. BondererDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1956

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Harrell's Candy Kitchen, Inc. v. SARASOTA-MANATEE AIR. AUTH.Supreme Court of Florida · 1959
  2. James Weir v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
  3. State Ex Rel. Sanborn v. Unified School District 259Supreme Court of Kansas · 1975
  4. S. B. Allen v. W. Lewis DavidCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
  5. Corpstein v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API