Continental Research Corp. v. Reeves
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Birdsong, Presiding Judge.
Appellant Continental Research Corporation (CRC) appeals from a judgment entered in favor of appellees in a products liability case involving inter alia allegations of improper labeling and a claim for loss of consortium, and from an order denying appellant’s motion for new trial.
Appellee Ed Reeves, who specializes in heating, ventilation, air conditioning and refrigeration repair, was injured when he accidentally sprayed Con-Coil air conditioner cleaner inside a glove and got *121the product on his hands. Con-Coil contains a hydrofluoric acid and this fact was known to…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited27 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Coe & Payne Co. v. Wood-Mosaic Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1973
- Shellenberger v. TannerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Pitts Ex Rel. Pitts v. Seneca Sports, Inc.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 2004
- Chrysler Corp. v. BattenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
- Joiner v. LaneCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
- Quiktrip Corp. v. ChildsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
- Oglethorpe Power Corp. v. SheriffCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.