Legal Opinion

Marley v. Ibelli

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 16, 2002No. Docket No. 01-6255PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUMMARY ORDER

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the decision of said district court be and it hereby is AFFIRMED.

Plaintiff-appellant J. Craig Marley appeals from the district court’s October 31, 2001 judgment granting the motion of defendants-appellees Juliette Ibelli and Cordelia Rose to substitute defendant-appellee the United States as the named defendant under the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2671 et seq., and, following substitution, to dismiss the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to state a claim. The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Murphy v. American Home Products Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Ruffolo v. Oppenheimer & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
  3. Perry v. Ethan Allen, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
  4. United States v. DiazCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  5. Janet H. McHugh v. University of Vermont Christopher Wheeler James P. Alexander and United States of America (u.s. Army), Christopher WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Aryai v. Forfeiture Support Associates, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
  2. Smith v. BrownDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2017
  3. Lipkin v. United States Securities & Exchange CommissionDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
  4. Tigano, III v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API