Legal Opinion

State v. Dickinson

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided February 22, 2000No. 3120PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEARN, Justice:

Martin K. Dickinson appeals his conviction for obtaining property under false pretenses in violation of S.C.Code Ann. § 16-13-240 (Supp.1999). He contends the trial judge erred in failing to direct a verdict of acquittal as the state failed to produce sufficient evidence that he obtained property from the victim with the intent to cheat or defraud. We disagree and affirm.

FACTS/PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On January 10,1998, Dickinson drove a rental car to Ronnie Carter Pontiac (Dealer) in Rock Hill, South Carolina and indicated a desire to purchase a vehicle. After test-driving several…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Mid-State Auto Auction of Lexington, Inc. v. AltmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
  2. State v. BurdetteSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  3. Rowe v. HyattSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
  4. State v. CraneSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1988
  5. State v. LoveSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Lee v. Thermal Engineering Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
  2. Hall v. United Rentals, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006
  3. Gattis v. MURRELLS INLET VFW 10420Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
  4. State v. BullCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
  5. Joye v. YonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API