State v. Dickinson
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HEARN, Justice:
Martin K. Dickinson appeals his conviction for obtaining property under false pretenses in violation of S.C.Code Ann. § 16-13-240 (Supp.1999). He contends the trial judge erred in failing to direct a verdict of acquittal as the state failed to produce sufficient evidence that he obtained property from the victim with the intent to cheat or defraud. We disagree and affirm.
FACTS/PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On January 10,1998, Dickinson drove a rental car to Ronnie Carter Pontiac (Dealer) in Rock Hill, South Carolina and indicated a desire to purchase a vehicle. After test-driving several…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Mid-State Auto Auction of Lexington, Inc. v. AltmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
- State v. BurdetteSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
- Rowe v. HyattSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
- State v. CraneSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1988
- State v. LoveSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Lee v. Thermal Engineering Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
- Hall v. United Rentals, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006
- Gattis v. MURRELLS INLET VFW 10420Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
- State v. BullCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
- Joye v. YonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.