Legal Opinion
Villescas v. Richardson
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided November 6, 2000No. Civ.A. 97-B-1955PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BABCOCK, Chief Judge.
Defendants move for judgment on the pleadings, and summary judgment. Plaintiff moves to file a second amended complaint. All of the motions are opposed. The motions are adequately briefed, and oral argument would not materially aid their resolution. For the reasons set forth below, I grant in part and deny in part Defendants’ motions, and deny as moot Plaintiffs motion. Jurisdiction exists under 28 U.S.C. § 1331.
I
The following facts are undisputed unless otherwise noted. For over ten years, Plaintiff held the position of Equal Employment…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Shearson v. HolderDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2011
- Center for Legal Advocacy v. EarnestDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2002
- Wyoming v. United States Department of AgricultureDistrict Court, D. Wyoming · 2002
- Moore v. Gunnison Valley HospitalDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2001
- Scranton Laminated Labels, Inc. v. Florimonte (In re Florimonte)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.