Legal Opinion

Loos v. Wheeling & Lake Erie Ry. Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 10, 1938No. 27020PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGorman, J.

Prior to the adoption of the new Appellate Procedure Act (116 Ohio Laws, 104), effective January 1, 1936, many complexities arose with reference to the' determination of whether a cause was to be reviewed upon appeal or proceedings in error. Many litigants were deprived of a review by failure to invoke the appropriate procedure. Faced with such a situation in doubtful cases, oftentimes both an appeal and a petition in error were filed in reviewing courts. See Hull v. Bell Bros. & Co., 54 Ohio St., 228, 43 N. E., 584; Willson Improvement Co. v. Malone, 78 Ohio St., 232, 85 N. E., 51; Murray v.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Union Trust Co. v. LessovitzOhio Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Tenesy v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1938

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Curran v. BrookesOhio Supreme Court · 1943
  2. In Re Guardianship of WisnerOhio Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Wigton v. LavenderOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Caswell v. LermannOhio Court of Appeals · 1948
  5. American Security Corp. v. MartinOhio Court of Appeals · 1948

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API