Legal Opinion

United States ex rel. Palmer v. Lapp

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 30, 1917No. 2975PublishedCited by 22 opinions

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern Division of the Northern District of Ohio; John E. Safer, Judge. Mandamus by the United States, on relation of Charles H. A. Palmer, against Charles W. Eapp, United States marshal for the Northern district of Ohio. The writ was denied, and relator brings error.

1Per curiam

The United States marshal for the Northern district of Ohio revoked the appointment of his chief office deputy, and the court below refused to issue a writ of mandamus to compel the marshal to reinstate the deputy. The facts on which the mandamus proceeding was based and the reasons for denying the writ appear in the trial judge’s-opinion, hereafter set out. In our judgment the writ was rightly denied, and, subject to some explanation, we approve of the reasoning on which refusal of the writ was based. It is true that at the time the relator, Palmer, received his last appointment as chief…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Kepner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. Peck v. JennessSupreme Court of the United States · 1849
  3. Keim v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  4. Ex Parte Duncan N. HennenSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
  5. Parsons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  2. Bell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  3. Chamski v. Wayne County Board of AuditorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Love v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
  5. Commonwealth v. ParmarSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API