State v. Hull
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.
This involves two criminal prosecutions which were certified to this court and have been consolidated under one appeal. The first four issues in both cases are identical and question the constitutionality of RCW 9.68.010. Two additional issues are present in State v. Plumb and will be addressed separately in relation to the facts of that case.
Both appeals assert four constitutional challenges against RCW 9.68.010 pertaining to the publication of obscene materials. First, that statute is challenged on the basis that it is unconstitutionally vague because it does not mention, nor has it been…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. HarrissSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Washington Water Power Co. v. Washington State Human Rights CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- People Ex Rel. Tooley v. Seven Thirty-Five East Colfax, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1985
- State v. ReeceWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. MartellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979
- Commonwealth v. RosenbergMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.