Legal Opinion

Sesto v. Perduk, 23797 (2-20-2008)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 20, 2008No. 23797UnpublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY

This cause was heard upon the record in the trial court. Each error assigned has been reviewed and the following disposition is made:

{¶ 1} Appellants, Samuel and Jacqueline Sesto ("the Sestos"), appeal from the decision of the Summit County Court of Common Pleas which granted summary judgment in favor of Appellees on the Sestos' claim for legal malpractice. This Court affirms.

I

{¶ 2} On January 16, 2006, the Sestos filed suit against Appellees, David C. Perduk, Richard Martin, and Richard Martin, LPA. In their complaint, the Sestos alleged that Perduk and Martin…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Village of Grafton v. Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Viock v. Stowe-Woodward Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Henkle v. HenkleOhio Court of Appeals · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rayess v. McNameeOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. Roe v. Connolly, Hillyer & OngOhio Court of Appeals · 2024
  3. Ohio Fresh Eggs, LLC v. Smith & Kramer, PCDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2021
  4. Sesto v. PerdukOhio Supreme Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API