Legal Opinion

Klunenberg v. Rottinghaus

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 9, 1964No. 51336PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSnell, J.

Plaintiff was injured when she fell while helping her husband corral defendant’s cattle. The cattle had strayed from defendant’s field. Following a jury verdict for plaintiff the trial court sustained defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and plaintiff appeals.

In considering the propriety of the judgment notwithstanding the verdict the premise is the same as a directed verdict. We give the plaintiff’s evidence the most favorable construction it will reasonably bear. Citations unnecessary. See Rule of Civil Procedure 344(f) 2.

On December 18, 1960, defendant was the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wagner v. International Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
  2. Webber v. E. K. Larimer Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1944
  3. Chenoweth v. FlynnSupreme Court of Iowa · 1959
  4. Blessing v. WeldingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1939
  5. McClure v. RichardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Clinkscales v. Nelson Securities, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2005
  2. Henneman v. McCallaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
  3. Hysell v. Iowa Public Service Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
  4. Leaders v. DreherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
  5. Sabell v. Pacific Intermountain Express Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1975

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API