Legal Opinion

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Appellant, v. MICHAEL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Appellee

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided June 1, 1983No. 82-1713, 82-2421PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEANEY, Circuit Judge.

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission [EEOC] petitioned the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas to enforce an administrative subpoena duces tecum issued to the Michael Construction Co. [Michael Construction] during the EEOC investigation of a racial discrimination charge filed by Roy Jackson against the company. The district court refused to enforce the subpoena, and awarded Michael Construction attorneys’ fees as a prevailing defendant. We reverse and remand for enforcement of the subpoena.

I. FACTS

On May 14, 1980, Roy Jackson filed a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. United States v. LaSalle National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Associated Dry Goods Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. United States of America, and Mark W. Lawler, Special Agent of the Internal Revenue Service v. James E. Lask and Ruth L. LaskCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cobb v. StringerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
  2. Jenson v. Eveleth Taconite Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1991
  3. Cobb v. StringerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
  4. Soto v. John Morrell & Co.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2003
  5. Witzsche v. Jaeger & Haines, Inc.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API