Legal Opinion
United States of America, and Mark W. Lawler, Special Agent of the Internal Revenue Service v. James E. Lask and Ruth L. Lask
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided March 30, 1983No. 82-1526PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN R. GIBSON, Circuit Judge.
Taxpayers James E. Lask and Ruth L. Lask appeal from the district court * order directing enforcement of Internal Revenue Service summonses issued to various third-party recordkeepers. Taxpayers contend (1) that the IRS acted in bad faith in carrying out the investigation, (2) that a portion of the time period covered by the IRS summonses is barred by the statute of limitations contained in 26 U.S.C. § 6501(a) (1976), and (3) that the district court erred in denying taxpayers’ discovery requests and in quashing their trial subpoenas duces tecum. We affirm.
In July…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Donaldson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. LaSalle National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- United States of America and Dennis J. Hanzel, Special Agent, Internal Revenue Service v. Jay T. WillCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- United States of America and Charles A. Bowsher, Comptroller General of the United States of America v. McDonnell Douglas CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
- United States v. RueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell and CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- MARY A. ROBERT, — SIEGEL-ROBERT, INTERVENOR v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, —Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. ClaesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.