Legal Opinion

Thorpe v. Parker

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 17, 1930PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Tbe plaintiffs introduced tbe judgment roll in a former case between tbe parties under whom both plaintiffs and defendants respectively claim title. Tbis evidence was relied upon as an estoppel. Tbe defendants objected to tbe introduction of tbe evidence upon tbe ground tbat tbe estoppel by judgment was not pleaded, but tbe law has been settled contrary to tbe contention of tbe defendants. Stancill v. James, 126 N. C., 190, 35 S. E., 245; Moody v. Wike, 181 N. C., 509, 107 S. E., 457; Bullard v. Insurance Co., 189 N. C., 34, 126 S. E., 179. These decisions bold tbat tbe record and judgment,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bullard v. Pilot Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  2. Stancill v. . JamesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
  3. Moody v. . WikeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hampton v. North Carolina Pulp Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  2. Brewer v. ElksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API