Legal Opinion

Pringle v. Smith

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 19, 1926No. Appeal, 28PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

Plaintiff and others, being “the legal heirs of Elizabeth Myers,” deceased, agreed to sell a certain piece of real estate to defendant, the contract expressly providing that, “The conditions of this agreement are subject to the approval of the orphans’ court for the sale of any interests of any minor children in and to said described premises”; at the signing of the contract, defendant paid $500 on account of the purchase money, and took possession of the premises in question, which he still holds. An application was made to the orphans’ court, by the administrator of Elizabeth…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Class & Nachod Brewing Co. v. GiacobelloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  2. March v. Philadelphia & West Chester Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Corabi v. Curtis Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  2. Regan v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  3. Tupponce v. Pennsylvania R. R. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  4. Trimble v. Mennel Milling Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  5. Fertax Co. v. SpiegelmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API