C.B. v. Sonora School District
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION RE DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW AND MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL AND REMITTITUR
OLIVER W. WANGER, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Before the court are Defendants City of Sonora, Chief Mace McIntosh and Officer Hal Prock’s (collectively, “Defendants”), (1) Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law (Defs. Mot. JMOL, ECF No. 177) and (2) Motion for New Trial and Remittitur (Defs. Mot. NT, ECF No. 178). Plaintiff C.B., a minor, (“Plaintiff’) opposes both motions. (Pl. Opp’n JMOL, ECF No. 186; Pl. Opp’n NT, ECF No. 188.)
II. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
This civil rights action…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Century 21 Real Estate LLC v. All Professional Realty, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2012