Legal Opinion
United National Insurance v. Waterfront Realty Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 25, 1991No. 89 Civ. 4525 (MJL)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LOWE, District Judge.
Before this court is plaintiff United National Insurance Co.’s (“UNI”) motion for summary judgment pursuant to F.R.C.P. 56, and for a declaratory judgment stating that UNI has no duty to defend or indemnify the defendant Waterfront Realty Corp. (“Waterfront”), and the Tunnel, Inc. (“Tunnel”) in the pending state court action entitled Lourdes Ortiz v. The Tunnel, Inc. and Waterfront Realty Corp. Defendant Waterfront opposes this motion and makes a cross motion for summary judgment and for a declaratory judgment stating that UNI does have a duty to defend…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Breed v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Seaboard Surety Co. v. Gillette Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Servidone Construction Corp. v. Security InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Mount Vernon Fire Insurance v. Creative Housing Ltd.District Court, E.D. New York · 1992
- United National Insurance v. Waterfront N.Y. Realty, Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996