Legal Opinion

People v. Haynesworth

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 4, 1973PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFrederic E. Hammer, J.

Defendant moves to dismiss the indictment on the ground that the New York State “ notice-of-alibi ” statute is invalid (CPL 210.20).

The defendant was indicted by a Queens County G-rand Jury on April 19,1973 charged with the crimes of robbery in the first degree and assault in the second degree. On May 2 he was arraigned and entered a plea of “ not guilty ”. Thereafter the People served a notice of alibi (CPL 250.20) seeking the names and addresses of defendant’s alibi witnesses.

On. June 25, 1973 in an application before Mr. Justice Livoti, the defendant requested the District Attorney’s alibi…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Williams v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Wardius v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. People v. ElliotNew York Supreme Court · 1973

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. SumpterNew York Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Commonwealth v. JacksonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. People v. ElliotNew York Supreme Court · 1973
  4. People v. Carl J., New York County Courts1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API