Legal Opinion
People v. Carl J.
New York County Courts
Decided March 29, 1974PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
John 8. Lockman, J.
Defendant, through his attorney, moves to dismiss the indictment pursuant to CPL 210.20 because he was *539forced to comply with the provisions of CPL 250.20 which, he contends, has been declared unconstitutional by People v. Bush (33 N Y 2d 921).
On October 10, 1973, in People v. Carl J., Judge Raymond Wilkes, Nassau County Court, the defendant was directed as follows:
‘11. Within five days of the entry of this order, the defendant will comply with the alibi demand heretofore served by the District Attorney;
“ 2. Upon receipt of the appropriate response from the defendant as…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wardius v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- People v. Collins, New York County Courts1973
- People v. Baylis, New York County Courts1973
- People v. ElliotNew York Supreme Court · 1973
- People v. Guthman, New York County Courts1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. RaoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976