Bartlett v. Bunn
New York Supreme Court
Appeals from judgments dismissing the complaints. Actions against defendants as attorneys for an accounting. The answers set up an accounting, settlement and a release.
1Opinion of the CourtPutnam, J.
The two actions were brought against defendants as attorneys under a written power, dated September 27, 1883, wherein plaintiffs authorized defendants (and one John T. Bunn, since deceased), or any two of them to rent, sell, divide into lots, manage and control lands of the plaintiffs in Amsterdam, N. Y., and in Rahway, N. J.
Plaintiff Bartlett revoked her power on March 6,1885, and plaintiff Dean on April 20, 1888.
The complaint alleges that defendants had failed to account for their proceedings under said written power, and asked for an accounting.
*88On the trial it was proved by a sealed…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Bohlen v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Brown v. . LeighNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Barnes v. . QuigleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Corn Exchange Bank of Chicago v. BlyeNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- In re Vandervort's EstateNew York Supreme Court · 1892
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.